This entry was posted on Воскресенье, 5 апреля, 2015 at 20:43 and is filed under .
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
Zeh. Great test. Though would like to see the same tests performed with earlier versions of the flash player. Tried using H.264 on a project last year, but DID have problems with dropped frames, etc on slower windows machines…I’m assuming due to lack of hardware acceleration or?? My understanding is that H.264 DOES require more cpu ov;#7ead…e.I&r821h;m guessing your test results are mostly due to performance gains with the latest fp?Also, what do you use to encode your H.264′s and what settings do you use?Posted by on ·
Zeh. Great test. Though would like to see the same tests performed with earlier versions of the flash player. Tried using H.264 on a project last year, but DID have problems with dropped frames, etc on slower windows machines…I’m assuming due to lack of hardware acceleration or?? My understanding is that H.264 DOES require more cpu ov;#7ead…e.I&r821h;m guessing your test results are mostly due to performance gains with the latest fp?Also, what do you use to encode your H.264′s and what settings do you use?Posted by on ·